Your
RSS Feed Might Look Like Spam
RSS
feeds seem to be the breakout technology for the
year. With more users turning to them for driving
traffic to their site, it’s no wonder that a trail
of RSS feed spam is following in the wake. A careful
editing of your RSS feed could make the difference
between being classified as genuine content or RSS
spam.
RSS
search engines are just beginning to pick up steam.
As more RSS feeds become searchable, the number of visitors will increase and spam is sure to follow. It is an
unfortunate side effect of free communication. While
RSS users can typically unsubscribe to feeds they
deem as spam, browsing with keywords in an RSS
search engine is where the problem arises.
RSS
spam largely consists of three main types most often
found in the RSS search engines. The first type is
keyword stuffing.
Keyword
stuffing involves filling each RSS feed article with
high-value keywords for a specific topic. The
articles are not intended for human visitors, but
instead for search engine robots to direct traffic
to a target web site. This RSS spam technique is
nothing more than an adaptation of the typical
keyword-stuffed web page, often banned by major
search engines.
The
second type involves RSS feed link farms. These RSS
articles often contain very little content, if any,
other than a simple keyword. Their main attraction
is the feed title. Clicking the feed title takes the
user to a blog containing tens or hundreds of other
blogs and RSS feeds, each directing to more links
within the farm. The goal of this type of RSS spam
is to trick the user into clicking advertisements or
directing them to a product web site.
The
third type is the creation of fake RSS feeds. These
appear as legitimate, but often duplicated, article
content. Whether they provide value or not is
certainly debatable. These feeds are usually created
in mass, using automated scripts, and appear similar
in nature to the link farms. By attracting the users
to seemingly valuable content, they hope to gain
advertisement clicks or product web site traffic.
Your
RSS feed might happen to fall into one of these
three categories. While you may currently be
experiencing increased traffic from the RSS search
engines, these directories are working on filtering
out the RSS spam techniques. However, you can still
take advantage of RSS feeds and their power by
following an RSS-friendly guideline.
Refrain
from using automated scripts to create online
content used by your RSS feeds. Instead, write your
own original thoughts, product descriptions, and
reviews. It takes a little more time, but the search
engines will value this content much more highly,
your visitors will appreciate the unique content,
and the subscription count to your RSS feed will
grow. It is also important to keep your feed updated
with changing content as opposed to using a static
feed, which remains the same. Search engines value
dynamic feeds and will likely rank you higher as a
result.
There
are tools and services available, which aid in
keeping an RSS feed updated with your changing
content. Such services include FeedFire for
converting your web site content to a periodically
updated RSS feed or software such as FeedForAll for
creating and editing RSS feeds.
A
successful RSS feed is very much the same as a
successful web page. It may take a little more time
to digitize your thoughts, but the end result is
well worth the effort. By
avoiding the tricks in RSS feed spam, you can help
make the difference in quality of feeds and
enjoyment in your readers.
About
the Author:
ksoft
is a software company specializing in Internet
products including RSS Submit http://www.dummysoftware.com/rsssubmit.html,
software for submitting RSS feeds, podcasts, and
pinging blogs to over 65 RSS directories.
This
article may be freely distributed on all forms of
media so long as it is published with the author
source intact.
Resources:
1. FeedFire
converts web sites into a periodically updated RSS
feed http://www.feedfire.com
2.
FeedForAll creates, edits, and uploads RSS feeds. http://www.feedforall.com
Back
|